<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring the Audience to You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/</link>
	<description>The organic centre of blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air Blogging &#8212; Terry Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air Blogging &#8212; Terry Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] Are we pumping our blogs full of hot air so they&#8217;ll float into the blogospere, or are we grounding them with solid content? Are we more concerned with inflating the numbers (comments, page rank, subscriber count) than making them a true reflection of our blogs&#8217; relevance and usefulness? Do we really have anything we want to say? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are we pumping our blogs full of hot air so they&#8217;ll float into the blogospere, or are we grounding them with solid content? Are we more concerned with inflating the numbers (comments, page rank, subscriber count) than making them a true reflection of our blogs&#8217; relevance and usefulness? Do we really have anything we want to say? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>How do we blog? Let me count the ways... 

Despite your latest post, I'm not entirely sure that you and I are in disagreement. I think that bloggers who strictly adhere to the strategies prescribed by the experts (writing explicitly for Digg or Stumble) will end up with posts that come across as contrived, and that will ultimately turn readers off and away. 

Still, I don't think there's anything wrong with learning these strategies and applying them where appropriate. For instance, if you're trying to teach your readers something, there's nothing wrong with using a "How To..." title. To me, there's a difference between operating from strategy, and working with it. I don't sit around thinking up list posts, but if I come up with a post idea that would lend itself well to a list, then I will certainly pursue it. 

I guess what I'm trying to say is that there's a happy medium. We blog to please our readers. Our readers like catchy headlines, lists, and tutorials. They like whatever it is that makes a post Digg-able. If we know what readers like, why wouldn't we try to bring some of that to our blogs, at least when doing so is natural?

There's an old saying regarding writing and grammar: Learn the rules &lt;i&gt;and then&lt;/i&gt; break them. I think that applies here as well. It's good to know what works, what attracts readers, but that information should indeed be used judiciously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we blog? Let me count the ways&#8230; </p>
<p>Despite your latest post, I&#8217;m not entirely sure that you and I are in disagreement. I think that bloggers who strictly adhere to the strategies prescribed by the experts (writing explicitly for Digg or Stumble) will end up with posts that come across as contrived, and that will ultimately turn readers off and away. </p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with learning these strategies and applying them where appropriate. For instance, if you&#8217;re trying to teach your readers something, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with using a &#8220;How To&#8230;&#8221; title. To me, there&#8217;s a difference between operating from strategy, and working with it. I don&#8217;t sit around thinking up list posts, but if I come up with a post idea that would lend itself well to a list, then I will certainly pursue it. </p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is that there&#8217;s a happy medium. We blog to please our readers. Our readers like catchy headlines, lists, and tutorials. They like whatever it is that makes a post Digg-able. If we know what readers like, why wouldn&#8217;t we try to bring some of that to our blogs, at least when doing so is natural?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an old saying regarding writing and grammar: Learn the rules <i>and then</i> break them. I think that applies here as well. It&#8217;s good to know what works, what attracts readers, but that information should indeed be used judiciously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhett Soveran</title>
		<link>http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhett Soveran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Melissa.

I see where you are coming from, but I really think blogging is changing and ought to change.  This is essentially what the eBook is going to be about.  I will say that in order to &lt;em&gt;build readership&lt;/em&gt; we have lost something significant.  I believe there is just a little bit too much &lt;em&gt;business&lt;/em&gt; in blogging.

In my mind it really comes down to who you believe your audience to be: consumers or people.  Are we continuous marketers hocking our words or people communicating with other people.  Because the idea of building a readership is really just building a consumer base for one to profit.  There is room for business in blogging, but it has been given too much weight for too long.  I certainly hope and am working for a day when I can blog full time with Epiblogger.  But I also believe that we bloggers (generally) have lost quality in our writing and content because we have given in to superficial, weak and &lt;em&gt;proven&lt;/em&gt; strategies in lieu of writing beneficial and quality material in order that we might communicate fully with other people.

This all might come off as a bit ideal and I recognize that, but I think there is room for a shift in thought on &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; we blog.  Essentially, I think we can have our cake and eat it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Melissa.</p>
<p>I see where you are coming from, but I really think blogging is changing and ought to change.  This is essentially what the eBook is going to be about.  I will say that in order to <em>build readership</em> we have lost something significant.  I believe there is just a little bit too much <em>business</em> in blogging.</p>
<p>In my mind it really comes down to who you believe your audience to be: consumers or people.  Are we continuous marketers hocking our words or people communicating with other people.  Because the idea of building a readership is really just building a consumer base for one to profit.  There is room for business in blogging, but it has been given too much weight for too long.  I certainly hope and am working for a day when I can blog full time with Epiblogger.  But I also believe that we bloggers (generally) have lost quality in our writing and content because we have given in to superficial, weak and <em>proven</em> strategies in lieu of writing beneficial and quality material in order that we might communicate fully with other people.</p>
<p>This all might come off as a bit ideal and I recognize that, but I think there is room for a shift in thought on <em>how</em> we blog.  Essentially, I think we can have our cake and eat it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epiblogger.net/bring-the-audience-to-you/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I think there are some useful pieces of advice out there on writing posts that will attract more readers. That doesn't mean that as a writer/blogger, you should ignore your own voice or withhold your message. Using such tactics occasionally can help build readership and are proven methods of bringing your audience to you. Catchy headlines, lists, and tutorials are all proven strategies. You make a good point, but I think that we need to cooperate with the greater blogosphere if we truly want to draw readers, and sometimes that means subscribing to such formats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are some useful pieces of advice out there on writing posts that will attract more readers. That doesn&#8217;t mean that as a writer/blogger, you should ignore your own voice or withhold your message. Using such tactics occasionally can help build readership and are proven methods of bringing your audience to you. Catchy headlines, lists, and tutorials are all proven strategies. You make a good point, but I think that we need to cooperate with the greater blogosphere if we truly want to draw readers, and sometimes that means subscribing to such formats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
